WebDec 6, 2001 · The cases cited by the Court do not preclude judgment as a matter of law in this case. In Ting v. United States, 927 F.2d 1504 (9th Cir.1991), ... City of Bremerton, 268 F.3d at 651-52 (quoting Chew v. Gates, 27 F.3d 1432, 1440 (9th Cir.1994)). The Court apparently presumes because of the significance of the injury that the officers used ... WebApr 17, 2012 · Cases Ashcroft v. al–Kidd, 563 U.S. 731 (2011) ..... 26 Blanford v. Sacramento ... Chew v. Gates, 27 F.3d 1432 (9th Cir. 1994) ..... 19 Curnow v. ... state law negligence claim, and later granted his motion for summary judgment on the excessive force
Chew v. Gates Case Brief for Law School LexisNexis
Websafe, however, the law generally protects caseworkers sued in connection with their jobs. Specifically, if a caseworker’s actions meet certain criteria, the parent cannot get money from the caseworker even if a court later finds that the caseworker made the wrong decision about an investigation or removal. As stated in the case of Austin v WebGomez v. Gates, 804 F. Supp. 69 (C.D.Cal. 1992). Trevino was not a party to the lawsuit. The Gomez jury found the police chief and the officers involved liable, awarded nominal compensatory damages of $1 and a total of $44,000 in punitive damages in varying amounts against the LAPD officers. findlay st bc
DEORLE v. RUTHERFORD (2001) FindLaw
WebIn Illinois v. Gates, the U.S. Supreme Court abandoned the two-prong test of Aguilar v. Texas and Spinelli V. United States as the sole criterion for determining whether information received from an anonymous tipster amounted to probable cause to issue a search warrant. In lieu of this so-called rigid approach, the Court adopted a 'totality-of ... WebAug 21, 2003 · Cf. Watkins v. City of Oakland, 145 F.3d 1087, 1093 (9th Cir.1998) (holding that “excessive duration of the bite ․ could constitute excessive force”); Chew, 27 F.3d at 1441 (“By all accounts, the force used to arrest Chew was severe. Chew was apprehended by a German Shepherd taught to seize suspects by biting hard and holding.”). WebChew v. Gates, #91-55718, 27 F.3d 1432, 1440 (9th ... were entitled to qualified … findlay st michael church